The GAP Rebrand Debacle: Lessons in Brand Identity
- Jack Willoughby
- Oct 4, 2023
- 4 min read
Updated: May 1
Last Updated: April 28, 2025
In the world of marketing and branding, there are countless success stories of companies reinventing themselves and capturing new markets.
However, for every success, there are cautionary tales like the infamous GAP rebranding fiasco of 2010. The brand launched an unnecessary redesign that cost the company millions of dollars and lasted a mere six days before reverting back to it's previous branding.
This incident serves as a stark reminder that sometimes, “If it’s not broke, don’t fix it” holds true even for established brands.

The ill-Fated GAP Rebrand

Attempting to infuse renewed excitement into their brand, GAP made a bold decision to overhaul their logo in 2010.
Unfortunately for them, this move turned out to be an unmitigated disaster. Almost overnight, the company managed to undo two decades worth of careful brand cultivation.
The redesign was met with widespread criticism and ridicule from both customers and design experts alike. Within a mere six days, GAP decided to retreat from their ill-conceived rebranding effort and revert back to their original logo. Unfortunately for them, this backtrack came at a heavy cost - millions of dollars lost and significant damage to their brand identity.
Fast Forward to 2025: A Sustainability-Driven Evolution
While the 2010 logo fiasco taught us caution, GAP’s 2023–25 brand refresh flipped the script—centring sustainability in every design choice. The new “Globe” hangtag icon debuted on Earth Day 2025, signalling GAP’s commitment to 100% sustainably-sourced cotton and reduced water usage across Denim lines, aligning aesthetics with its ESG mission.
Results & Impact of the 2025 Sustainability Rebrand
100% Sustainable Cotton Achieved: Met the 2025 target across Old Navy, Gap, Banana Republic & Athleta.
20%+ Water Reduction: Washwell™ adoption cut denim water use by ≥20% YoY.
Traceability Milestone: All Tier 2 mills now in the U.S. Cotton Trust Protocol for full farm-to-rack visibility.
Green-Rated Factories: 87% of sourcing spend in green-rated factories—beating the 80% goal set for 2025.
Valuable Lessons Learned
While the GAP rebrand may be considered one of the worst in history, it offers several crucial lessons that all businesses should take note of:
Respect what works: There is wisdom in the age-old adage “If it’s not broke, don’t fix it.” If a brand has successfully built a loyal customer base and established a strong identity over time, tampering with it hastily can prove disastrous.
A rationale behind change: Rebrands or packaging updates should always have a compelling reason driving them. It’s essential that businesses thoroughly evaluate the need for change and justify it based on tangible objectives such as market trends or shifts in consumer preferences.
Emotional connection matters: Customers often develop emotional connections with brands they love. Companies must exercise caution when making changes that could potentially sever these connections. Understanding and respecting customer sentiment should always be at the forefront of any strategic branding decision.
Listen to your audience: An intelligent marketer acknowledges that customers are integral stakeholders who can guide decision-making processes effectively. Engaging with customers through surveys, feedback mechanisms, or social media conversations can provide valuable insights into how they perceive your brand.
Testing before launch: It’s a good idea to test new branding elements on a small scale before a full-scale rollout. This can help gauge customer reactions and make necessary adjustments, thus avoiding a public relations disaster and significant financial loss.
FAQ
Q1: What exactly is GAP’s 100% sustainable cotton commitment?
It covers all U.S. and global brands under GAP Inc., requiring every cotton supplier to meet U.S. Cotton Trust Protocol standards by end of 2025.
Q2: How much water does Washwell™ save?
Washwell™ methods reduce water use by at least 20% compared to conventional denim processing.
Q3: Where can I see GAP’s full ESG targets?
Visit GAP Inc.’s official ESG Report for detailed 2025 goals on climate, water, and worker welfare.
Q4: How did GAP exceed its green-rated factory goal?
Through rigorous audits and supplier incentives, GAP allocated 87% of sourcing spend to green-rated facilities—the highest in its history.
Twitter’s Current Challenge
We face another contemporary example reaffirming these hard-learned lessons—the enduring association between Twitter (X) and its users who still commonly refer to the platform as ‘Twitter.’ Despite attempts at rebranding efforts, change isn’t happening overnight.
Read more about Twitter’s rebranding efforts here.
In today’s dynamic business landscape where competition is fierce and consumer loyalty paramount, getting branding right is more critical than ever before.
It is important for companies undergoing significant changes or rebrands to study past blunders like the GAP rebrand saga carefully. By heeding these lessons learned from costly missteps, we ensure our own brands thrive while avoiding pitfalls along the way.
So remember—cherish what has worked so far; back every transformation with solid reasoning; honour customers’ emotional bonds; listen intently; evolve thoughtfully but not at any cost.
Join me on this journey of building powerful brands that stand resilient amidst change!
→ 'A Marketers Mindset' Newsletter: For more insightful tips on branding strategies and marketing trends, subscribe to my newsletter today for a regular dose of valuable industry knowledge delivered straight to your inbox! (click here).
Comments